When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. From June 13, 2018, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property at the “D convenience store” operated by the victim C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Seoul-si, by taking advantage of the cresh in which the surveillance of employees was neglected, by inserting the crepit in the air conditioners, in a way that the autopsy prepared for one illness was put in a plastic sealing and emitted from one illness at the market price of KRW 5,00,000 at that place, from that time, until July 18, 2018, the Defendant stolen the victims’ property worth KRW 73,000 in total nine times, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. On June 12, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the “D convenience store” operated by the victim C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) the receipt that another person paid to his/her employees in cash; and (c) the receipt that another person paid to his/her employees in cash, and the Defendant

It presented three diseases due to the agreement, and it was purchased at the convenience store of the victim, and it was delivered KRW 61,000 by deceiving the victims six times from that time to July 18, 2018, including the receipt of KRW 10,000 in cash from the employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of C, E, F, G, and H;

1. Receipts for re-issuance related to the crime;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records related to each case

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 347 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was sentenced to a fine on several occasions for the crime of the same kind of law and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in June of 2017. Even if the defendant was sentenced to a fine twice as a result of larceny during the suspended sentence period, he/she committed each of the crimes of this case, and the responsibility for the crime is very heavy.

However, the following favorable or consideration shall be given to the accused: