beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.06.12 2018나62567

채권조사확정재판에 대한 이의의 소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are justifiable in view of each of the evidence submitted by the court of first instance to the court of first instance as evidence Nos. 11 and 15 (including the serial number).

Therefore, the reasoning for this court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the issue of “infinite” under Section 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) the “F” under Sections 4, 17; and (c) the “F” under Sections 5, 6, and the “paid” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is identical to the ground for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, (c) the same shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence

2. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.