When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2019. 1. 19. 01:35경 서울 중랑구 B 앞 노상에서 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울중랑경찰서 C파출소 소속 경찰관 D과 함께 피해자로서 조사를 받기 위하여 순찰차 뒷좌석에 동승하고 위 파출소로 이동하던 중, 술에 취하여 아무 이유 없이 D이 앉아 있는 순찰차 조수석 머리받침 부분을 주먹으로 2회 때리고, D이 순찰차를 정차하고 피고인을 제지하자 주먹을 휘두르며 발로 D의 왼쪽 정강이를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the protection of the lives, bodies, and property of the people.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the defendant commits a mistake against and is expected not to repeat the crime; (b) the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties appears to be a contingency crime under the influence of alcohol; (c) there is no record of criminal punishment except punishment imposed once due to a drunk driving; (d) the details of the crime and circumstances after the crime; (e) the defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment; and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered by the disposition