If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. When the victim E demands from May 25, 2017 to pay the taxi fee from May 25, 2017 to 05:30, from May 25, 2017, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties requested the victim E to pay the taxi fee in front of the D District located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si.

In this regard, the victim took a bath, and obstructed the victim's taxi business by force by preventing the victim from operating the vehicle, such as leaving the door of the taxi driver's seat and blocking the direction of progress.

2. On May 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 06:00, at the same place as the above paragraph (1) above, arrested flagrant offenders on the same grounds as the above paragraph (1) and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by taking advantage of spiting F, “F, who is detained on the next left of the patrol vehicle; (b) f, who is affiliated with D police station of the branch police station of the branch; and (c) f, who f, at the top of the police station of the branch police station of the branch police station of the branch; and (d) f, who f, at the police station of the branch station located in the branch of the branch in the city of Sungnam, in order to transfer a new disease to the police station of the branch police station of the branch; and (d) f, who spited F on one occasion at the face of the above F, thereby interfering with the police officer’s lawful execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

3. On June 2, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 06:30 on June 2, 2017, the Police Station D District of the branch police station located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si; (b) was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) was under the influence of alcohol, and (d) was under the influence of alcohol for approximately 30 minutes of disturbance, such as using al, weather, and al, al, and al, using al, musical music in a very rough manner at a government office, and scrupted or scrued by very rough words and actions at the police office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. A written statement of the main officer and the application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report investigation;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the same Act concerning criminal facts.