If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On January 18, 2013, from around 22:30 to 23:20, the Defendant: (a) stated that two male persons, who do not know about their table table, drinked with drinking together at the second drinking house of the Daejeon Jung-gu building C, Daejeon, without permission, do so; (b) stated that “I would like to see where I would like to see, if I would like to see, and I would like to see, if I would like to see, if I would like to see, I would come to go to the customer; and (c) after having received a report from the police officer, I would see, “I would interfere with the victim’s business,” and sounded “I would see, if I would see,” and interfere with the victim’s business by force by harming the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness E, F and G's statutory statements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant is the primary offender, contingent crimes and minor damages, and the victim does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim after the prosecution is instituted.