beta
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2016.11.23 2016가단8613

면책확인

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged as being in dispute between the parties or as being incorporated into each of the statements in Gap evidence of 1 to 3, 5, 6, and Eul evidence of 1 to 7 (including additional evidence of 1 to 7).

A. The Plaintiff joined the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation as a credit card member on June 18, 2002 (hereinafter “Agricultural Cooperative”) and used a credit card (hereinafter “the instant credit card”), but failed to pay the credit card payment from May 7, 2005.

B. On September 21, 2005, No. 2005Kadan812, the No. 3,701,917 had the credit card payment claim of this case as the credit card payment claim of this case, and the provisional attachment registration of each of the above real estate was completed upon receipt of the provisional attachment order for the land B and the land owned by the Plaintiff, Bosung-gun, Bosung-gun, the Seoul High Court of Gwangju District Court, 2005, which was a 2005Kadan812, and the provisional attachment registration of each of the above real estate was completed. After receiving the decision from the Credit Counseling Service to support credit recovery from the Credit Counseling Service, the rehabilitation rehabilitation procedure was invalidated on January 2

C. Accordingly, on August 3, 2009, No. 4,168,702, agricultural cooperatives received a provisional attachment order for the land D and E owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the second provisional attachment”) from the Gwangju District Court, 2009Kadan327, Jicheon-gun District Court, Seoul High Court Decision 2009Kadan327, and on the same day, the provisional attachment registration was completed for each of the above real property.

Afterwards, agricultural cooperatives filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff to seek payment of the credit card price of this case with the Gwangju District Court 2009 Ghana, 6810, and on December 22, 2009, the above court rendered a judgment that "the plaintiff shall pay 25% per annum from July 30, 2009 to December 16, 2009 and 2,359,436 won per annum from December 30, 2009 to December 16, 2009, and 20% per annum from December 17, 2009 to the day of full payment."