However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around June 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) informed the victim C (Nam, 55 years of age) who was engaged in a campaign in a park adjacent to the E pharmacy located adjacent to the E pharmacy located adjacent to Pakistan on June 9, 2013; (b) discovered the victim, and (c) made the statement that “59 years of ring, she shall be dead, and she shall be dead,” while drinking the victim’s face at several times; (d) when drinking the victim’s side at the right side of the victim four times; and (d) when drinking the victim’s side side of drinking, the Defendant inflicted injury, such as “nannoptying in the side and mathing blood,” which requires treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the C statement);

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A written statement;

1. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted as the reason for conviction in the death diagnosis report: (a) the victim made a concrete and consistent statement in the investigative agency and court that he was committed by the defendant while making a campaign in a park adjacent to the E pharmacy; (b) the witness F also made a statement that he was faced with the victim without any particular reason; (c) the specific statement is consistent with the victim’s statement in lieu of the victim’s statement; (d) the defendant also made a statement that he was bread with the victim’s statement; and (e) the police made a statement that he was bread with the victim’s breathy and breathy; and (e) at the time, the victim made a statement that 59 years of birth was bread with the victim’s breathy, and the prosecution also made a statement that the victim was bread with the Defendant.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of imprisonment with labor (in consideration of the fact that the defendant denies the crime and that there is a history of imprisonment with labor and fines sentenced in several times in the previous case);

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act: