However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No one shall provide game products for distribution or use, which have not been classified by the Rating Board pursuant to Acts, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

Nevertheless, on May 29, 2013, from around 16:00 to around 00:10 on June 2, 2013, the Defendant established 15 game 's game 's 's spin-pin-pin-pin-pin-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-pat-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs and seized objects;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response as a result of appraisal;

1. Relevant Article of the relevant criminal facts, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: The defendant committed again the crime of this case even though he had been before a stay of execution of the same kind in 2008, the number of the game machines installed by the defendant is not specified as 15; the crime of this case is committed in favor of the fact that the defendant has an adverse effect on the formation of a sound society: The defendant reflects the crime; the period for displaying or keeping the game of this case is short; the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, family environment, etc. are considered; and all other circumstances, which are conditions for sentencing