근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative of D in Gwangju, who is engaged in restaurant business with four regular workers. From July 2, 2013 to November 26, 2014, the Defendant did not pay KRW 632,916 of the employee E’s retirement allowances provided by the said workplace from June 1, 2013 to September 29, 2014, KRW 529,665 of the employee F’s retirement allowances provided by the said workplace within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the respective parties on the extension of the due date for payment.
2. Determination of applicable provisions of Acts: subparagraph 1 of Article 44 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Judgment dismissing a motion for each punishment after the victims under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act have been prosecuted: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;