However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2016. 7. 31. 03:30 경 대전 동구 B에 있는 대전 동부 경찰서 C 파출소에서, 술에 취한 상태에서 아무런 이유 없이 상황근무 중인 위 파출소 소속 순경 D에게 “ 야, 씹할 놈 아. 뭘

I. We desire to see that the above D was off the shot, which was reported to be able to return home to the defendant, and was frighted to the wall, and the process of the police box belonging to the above police box where E was removed from the defendant, and as the E was able to put the arms after pushing the body of E, and used to put the guns of the documents on the shot, and used to assault the above D and E by gathering the guns of the documents on the shot.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the situation service within the police box.

2. The Defendant, who damaged public goods, was arrested as an offender at the time, place, and at the time, place specified in paragraph 1, and was arrested as a current offender who interfered with the performance of official duties, and tried to walk the computer, books, and partitions, which are goods used for official purposes in the above police box, which is an object used for official purposes, at the above police box, intended to damage the Defendant’s personal information, etc., but failed to commit such an attempted act due to the failure of the department.

3. On July 31, 2016, around 04:35, the Defendant suffered an injury to the Defendant’s arms and the Defendant, who was parked in the front of the Daejeon East Police Station C police box located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, by asking the Defendant, who was suffering from disturbance, such as the victim D (25 taxes) in order to take the neck on the back of the vehicle, to take the neck on the back of the vehicle, and by asking the Defendant, who was walking the neck on the back of the vehicle, the Defendant sustained an injury to the Defendant before the right side that requires treatment for about 10 days.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' arrest and escort service, and at the same time injured the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. On-site photographs;

1. To cut CCTVs;