1. On June 26, 2016, the Defendant who interfered with his/her duties drinks alcoholic beverages into a daily log operated by the victim C in Sungnam-si A around 19:00 on June 26, 2016.

During the period of Eul'sping, the victim told "Is the stude and going out of the store", and the victim expressed the victim "Is the hude that "Is the hack and the hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker, and the hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's hacker's k

2. The injured Defendant: (a) prevented the Defendant who the Victim C (V, 60 years of age) sought to avoid disturbance as above; (b) spreads the Victim’s hand by taking the Victim’s hand with the Victim’s hand; and (c) inflicted injury on the Victim, including approximately five weeks of treatment on the left-hand part of the four weeks of need for treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the increase of concurrent crimes in the basic area of crimes (including violence) falling under the first sentence of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, and Article 1 of the Reasons for the Sentencing [the scope of the recommended punishment] and Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes (Interference with Duties) (Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes) (Article 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes [the scope of the recommended punishment] / [the scope of the recommended punishment]] of the basic area of crimes (Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes (Article 37 to 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Crimes]. The victim failed to take advantage of the degree of injury from the damaged person, and the victim failed to hear from the victim's end of the year after the occurrence of the case.