A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 12, 2016, Defendant A received the 112 report that he was a drinking person while drinking alcohol at a “E” restaurant located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 12, 2016, and the Defendant sent to the police station, such as the victim F (age 45) who is the police official belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station, and reported that the police officer was shouldered B, and that the police officer “I have been discharged to the police officer who was discharged to have been discharged from her farb chp kbb.”

“I, as soon as possible, to the extent that “I,” or “I, to the extent that I or I or I or I or she is,

“Abscked the victim,” and the police officer dispatched the victim’s 112 report to “in the course of performing his/her official duties,” but continued to go through the time, the victim was collected from the victim who explained the situation to the Defendant’s daily activities by gathering the victim, and assaulted the victim’s math, and damaged the victim’s plastic chairs owned by the said E-cafeteria operator.

Accordingly, the defendant, upon receiving 112 reports, interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers during the process of handling reports, and damaged the property of the victim E-cafeteria operator.

2. Defendant B, upon receiving a report from 112 from the time and place under paragraph (1), was drunk and used at the site, obstructed the arrest of the police officer G, such as cutting off the shoulder of the police officer G, in order to arrest a person who obstructed the performance of official duties as set forth in paragraph (1) as a current offender, and the Defendant was forced to control the victim H (37 years old), a police officer belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station, who was called for the police officer belonging to the Pyeongtaek Police Station, and assaulted the victim, such as selling the victim’s name by drinking, while taking a bath to “the flap chp ch kb.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in charge of 112 reporting processing and arresting flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. Application of the laws and regulations of I and J;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Article 136 of the Criminal Act;