In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Defendants, E, and F are the relationship between the Defendants, E, and F, known to and known about five years prior to that time.

피고인들은 E, F, 성명불상자와 함께 2015. 4. 9. 04:45경 부산 동래구 G 소재 ‘H’ 주점 인근 도로에서, 택시를 기다리던 피해자 I(24세)와 그 여자친구인 J에게 아무런 이유 없이 욕설을 하였고, 이에 피해자가 다가와 사과를 요구한다는 이유로 시비가 되어 피해자와 말다툼을 하던 중, 성명불상자는 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 피고인 A은 이에 가세하여 손으로 피해자를 밀쳐 바닥에 넘어뜨리고, 피고인 B은 넘어진 피해자에게 다가가 발로 피해자의 어깨 부위를 수회 걷어 차고, 성명불상자는 발로 피해자의 온몸을 수회 걷어찼다.

The Defendants, in collaboration with the injured party in his name, inflicted injury on the injured party, such as the impairment of the diversity of the diversatory body part, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A witness I and each legal statement of the J;

1. Part of the prosecutor's protocol of interrogation against the Defendants I and J

1. Each statement made to I and J;

1. The written diagnosis of injury (I) (In the case of Defendant B, Defendant B asserts that the testimony of the J is not reliable; however, in light of the fact that the J consistently states the Defendant’s violent facts during the police investigation process up to this court, and that there is no possibility that the Defendant may confuse the Defendant’s other behaviors with the other behaviors on the part of the Defendant, as the most key in the case of Defendant B is written, there is credibility in the statement of the J in light of the application of the law).

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning a crime;

1. Although it was not possible to agree with the victim for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, in the case of the defendant A, there was no criminal history and the case of the defendant B.