특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Punishment of the crime
On January 10, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months at the Changwon District Court for the crime of larceny at night, and 4 months, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months by the same court on November 24, 2006.
피고인은 2011. 10. 7. 11:30경부터 같은 날 13:10경 사이에 창원시 성산구 C 1층 안채에 있는 피해자 D의 집에 이르러 현관 출입문 옆의 잠겨 있지 않은 주방 창문을 열고 들어가 그곳 안방에 있던 피해자 소유의 현금 10만 원 및 시가 20만 원 상당의 18K 1돈 여자 목걸이 1개, 시가 100만 원 상당의 18K 2돈 다이아반지 1개, 시가 70만 원 상당의 18K 3½돈 여자 금팔찌 1개 등 시가 합계 190만 원 상당의 귀금속류 3개를 들고 나와 절취하였다.
From that time until December 21, 2012, the Defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals money and valuables equivalent to KRW 23,193,000 in total, by the same method, as shown in the annexed list of crimes, from that time until December 21, 2012.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each statement of E, F, D, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;
1. A report on investigation (to attach a screen screen of a black box);
1. Investigation report (the confirmation of purchase of stolen water disposal disposition P);
1. Investigation report (to take photographs of criminal scene and intrusion devices);
1. Investigation reports (verification of damaged articles);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (report on confirmation of the same record as the suspect);
1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same kind of crimes are repeated several times in a planned manner;
1. Article 5-4 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Articles 329 and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and Articles 5-4 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of specific crimes;
1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation has already been sentenced to punishment for larceny, but the method of committing the crime in this case has already been committed.