When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 22, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) at the KS Telecom C store located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, using a computer in the pre-printed service contract form; (b) stated “D”, “E”, “F”, “F”, “H”, “D” in the bank name column; (c) the bank name column; (d) the deposit owner’s resident registration number column; and (d) the applicant customer column printed two copies of the new service contract form with the name of “D”, “E”, “F”, “F”, “D”, and “D”, and written two copies of the new service contract form using a visible pen on the name of “D”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of a new service contract in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. In the event of the uttering of the above investigation document, the Defendant exercised two copies of the service contract forged as if it were duly formed at the same time to the employee in charge of the opening of the Stecom, who is aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of statutes on a copy of a new service contract;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act as to the facts constituting an offense, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;