The defendant is a person who engages in insurance business at the location of KRB life D in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 406.

1. Crimes against victims E;

A. A. On May 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the first three future Egsan-si, Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-si; (b) “If a child-care center director or infant-care teacher is under termination losses, the amount of cancellation losses would occur; (c) was refunded to the victim, who is the director of the child-care center, by inserting a civil petition with the head office in the future deposit office; (d) preserving the principal without cancellation losses; and (e) paid the insurance money upon cancellation of the contract with the National Pension Service with the retirement pension; and (e) was embezzled by using the money deposited in the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant for personal living expenses, etc. on the same day while he was under custody for the victim.”

B. On June 27, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 1,007,020 from an agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant and embezzled it for the victim on the part of his/her business for personal life expenses, etc. on the same day while he/she kept in custody for the victim, on the same day while he/she received KRW 1,007,020 from the agricultural bank account under the name of the Defendant for the purpose of his/her business.

2. On January 20, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim H, the “J Child Care Center” in the “CJ” of the victim’s operation in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, stating that “The Defendant would pay retirement allowances to the retiring by settling the accounts of his/her employees on the face of transfer,” and embezzled by using the agricultural cooperative account under the name of the Defendant for the same day as KRW 3,000 on the same day, KRW 2,680,000 on January 21, 2016, KRW 13,500,000 on January 25, 2016, KRW 23,180,000 on a total of KRW 4,00,000 on January 27, 2016, while keeping the victim in custody on behalf of the victim at work.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;