A Imprisonment for 10 months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3 million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Defendant

A is the owner of a sexual traffic business with the trade name "H", and Defendant B plays a role in managing the above business at night.

1. The Defendants conspired to commit a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc. of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts by the Defendants (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) from January 25, 2017 to June 19, 2017 (Provided, That from May 10, 2017 to June 19, 2017, Defendant B: (a) leased 301 and 601 the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Itel 301; and (b) employed the Employment Council, etc. of a female employee of commercial sex acts, such as K, K, L, and M, advertising the said place of business on the advertising site of commercial sex acts such as “K”, “L”, and “M,” reported the said place of business from male buyers who found the said place of business to receive 60,000,000 to 150,000 won in price for commercial sex acts; and (c) gave guidance to whether a female employee of commercial sex acts is engaged in commercial sex acts, thereby impairinging or impairing sexual intercourse.

2. No person who violates the Act on the Protection of Educational Environment of Defendant A shall conduct any act or establish a business providing services that results in physical contact with, exposure to, or other similar acts to, an unspecified person in an educational environment protection zone in order to protect the health, sanitation, safety, learning, and educational environment of students;

Nevertheless, from January 25, 2017 to June 19, 2017, the Defendant, at a distance of 175.60 meters from the O middle school located in Seocho-gu Seoul N, Seocho-gu, Seoul, operated the business of having sexual intercourse between female workers and male buyers of sexual intercourse in each officetel, as described in paragraph 1, at the above Itel, which is an educational environment protection zone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The second written protocol concerning the suspect examination of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the defendant A.