Of the facts charged in this case, Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 16, 17, 18, and 6, 7, 8, 9, 17, and 18 of the

From February 17, 1998, the Defendant entered into a check contract with C in the name of the actual manager B and entered into a family check contract with C in the name of his wife D.

On June 23, 2004, the Defendant issued one copy of Cfamily check in the name of the above D, “F”, “5,000,000 won”, and the date of issuance, “ October 31, 2004,” and presented the above check to the above bank on November 1, 2004 during the period for which the said check was presented by the holder, but did not pay for the suspension of transaction or the termination of contract.

From that time until September 30, 2004, the Defendant issued 1 to 5, 10 to 15, and 19 to 31, as indicated in the list of annexed crimes, 24 times the above method, and each check holder has presented payment to the above bank within the payment period. However, each check holder did not receive payment as non-transaction, suspension of transaction, or termination of contract.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of each police station against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each written accusation (except Nos. 21, 26, and 28);

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Act on the Control of Illegal Check and Selection of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes appears to be against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case. When the defendant is unable to issue a check under the defendant's name because the business already operated was difficult, the check was issued in an unreasonable manner in his name, resulting in the crime of this case, and the defendant continued to escape for about 13 years since he anticipated the default of the check and left the country, and the defendant continued to escape for about 13 years after leaving the country, and the check was recovered or failed to repay the amount equivalent to the amount of the check. The circumstances and contents of each of the crimes of this case, and the issuance of a default check.