However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From January 10, 2016 to February 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a sexual traffic business establishment, “E” operated by the Defendant in Pyeongtaek-si; (b) from many unspecified number of men finding the place, the Defendant received cash of 120,000 won per 1 person as a price for sexual traffic; and (c) had female sexual traffic employees, such as F (n, 37 years of age) have sexual intercourse with the said male purchase.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of examination of suspects of G, H, F, I, J, K, and L;

1. A summary statement of M;

1. N’s statement;

1. Application of the provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes on credit cards and payment details, sales slips, each control photograph, and real estate lease contract (a copy);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Protection and observation, and community service work, under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing after Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic [the scope of recommendations] is to be strictly punished in that it continues to engage in business until it regulates three times, or three times, the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the decision of sentencing) is the basic area (one month to one year and four months).

Considering the scale, period, amount of profit, etc. of sexual traffic business;