beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.20 2016고정2249

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who drives a rocketing car on duty.

1. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: (a) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.181%; (b) led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle bypassing it from the side of Samsung Electrical Child Care Center to its original middle school.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to ensure that the driver of the vehicle is well aware of the front left and safely drive the vehicle and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and led the part of the DK5 car driven by the injured party C (28 years of age, South) who was running along one lane in the bend part of the center line while bypassing it. The part of the DK5 car driven by the injured party C (28 years of age, South) was shird with the front and rear part of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by negligence on the part of the Defendant, the injury to the victim at around two weeks of light tensions and tensions, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, bed, and bed, bed.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above Paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, driven the above rocketing car with approximately 700 meters of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol at about 0.181%.

3. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was found to have completed the part of the victim's left hand on the floor of hand, on the ground that the victim C taken a blon when the victim C was under the influence of alcohol in a blon, at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 1, and the defendant did not have any substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense. Thus, the defendant's correction should be made ex officio.