2. Determination

A. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the confession and reflection of the Defendant’s crime, and the economic difficulty at the time of the instant crime, which can be seen as a crime of living style, and some victims are not punished by the Defendant.

B. On the other hand, in light of the fact that the crime of this case committed several times with property stolen from many victims for a considerable period of time, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case again in the period of repeated crime due to the same crime even though the previous crime of this case and the sentence were imposed several times, and that the amount of damage is not significant, a sentence of sentence to the defendant is inevitable.

C. In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, living environment, motive, details and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence is adequate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.