However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2018. 8. 12. 22:00경 수원시 영통구 B건물, C호에 있는 피고인의 주거지에서 피해자 D(여, 21세)를 끌어안아 침대로 눕힌 후 피해자 몸 위에 올라 타 피해자의 몸을 눌러 반항하지 못하게 한 후 입을 맞추려고 하고 이에 피해자가 고개를 돌리며 저항하자 피해자의 오른쪽 귀 부위와 목 부위를 핥고 손으로 피해자의 두 손을 잡아 누른 후 피해자의 티셔츠와 속옷을 위로 올린 후 피해자의 가슴 부위를 핥고 계속하여 피해자의 바지와 팬티를 벗기려고 하는 등 피해자를 강간하려 하였으나 피해자가 발버둥을 치며 강하게 저항하자 범행을 멈추었다.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to rape the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the results of response by the State);

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 25 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of attempted crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Disclosure and Notice Orders, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the proviso to Article 56(1) of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 15452, Mar. 13, 2018); the Defendant’s personal information registration and taking lectures in sexual assault treatment alone appears to have the effect of preventing re-offending; the Defendant’s age, type, motive, process, seriousness of the crime in this case, disclosure notification and employment restriction order; and the degree of disadvantage that the Defendant was admitted, thereby.