B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

On May 9, 2018, at the E convenience store located in Seopopopo City D, around May 21:25, 2018, the Defendants inquired the Defendants at the “F’s main point of view whether the Defendants were fighting against the convenience store employees, etc., under the investigation of the developments and developments leading up to the Seochopo Police Station Hapo Police Station Hapo who was called up after receiving 112 reports on the cases involving G’s work and the dispute between G’s work and the horse. The Defendants threatened the Defendants.

As "" was said to be "humpted," and became one of them.

1. Defendant B and Defendant B cited cans without opening a dangerous object as hand, and sought to set the above I to the can cans which the above G used in his hand, but the above I did not cut the beer and stop, and assaulted the above I’s body with two hand, stating that “this can cans, embling, embling, etc.”

As a result, Defendant C, by putting a stone with a string of a string, which is a dangerous object in the vicinity, approaches the stone with a string, and string the stone with a string, and string the stone with a string, and string the stone with a string, Defendant C left the string on the floor of the string.

Recognizing that it is “,” and assaulted the body of the said J by hand, such as being sealed by hand, turning the body of the said J, and turning the body into hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants carried dangerous articles and interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties concerning handling reports and protecting people's body and property.

2. Defendant A’s defect that Defendant A tried to arrest Defendant B and C as the current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties by the said I, J, and C.

Recognizing that it was “,” and assaulted by hand, such as cutting down the lower part of the said I and J, and extinguishing the hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of people's body and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant B and A;

1. The defendant C's partial statement

1.K, I, and I.