A. (i) The defendant was retired from office as of October 31, 2010 by the defendant, who was appointed as the Air Force Second Lieutenant on August 1, 1989, and was appointed as the legal school officer of B on October 1, 1989. On August 1, 200, the defendant was promoted to Major Order on August 1, 200, and then promoted to the position as associate professor of B on May 16, 2005.

on September 20, 2010, the Minister of National Defense ordered the Defendant to be assigned to the position of associate professor B at school as of September 16, 2010. On September 28, 2010, the Air Force Chief issued a personnel order to dismiss the Defendant from the position of the professor B at school as of September 16, 2010, and on October 6, 2010, the Minister of National Defense issued a personnel order to retire from the position of B as of October 31, 2010.

Abstract Defendant, who was dissatisfied with the above personnel order, filed an administrative litigation with the Central Military Personnel Affairs Review Committee, but lost the judgment.

(Seoul Administrative Court 201Guhap6134, Seoul High Court 2011Nu42538, Supreme Court 2015Du1052).

On April 11, 1998, the Defendant occupied the Defendant’s official residence and occupied the Defendant, which was the Plaintiff’s ownership, occupied 10 or 505, the main purpose of which is the building ledger, and moved to the said C apartment 5 or 101 (hereinafter “instant official residence”) on August 28, 2003, and moved to the said C apartment 5 or 101 (hereinafter “instant official residence”) and went out until June 10, 2015.

The instant official residence is an official residence provided to the Defendant based on Article 9 of the Framework Act on Military Welfare.

C. The Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the eviction period by January 31, 201, which was three months from the date of discharge pursuant to the relevant provisions as seen below, and notified the Defendant of the eviction period from the instant official residence.

Facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 13 (including each number for those with a serial number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.