2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. After entering the Army on April 29, 1967, the Plaintiff participated in Vietnam from May 20, 1969 to January 6, 1970, and was discharged from military service on March 20, 1970.

B. On May 30, 2005, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for military service, in particular, by asserting that the Defendant suffered from the Magdong-si, Hosi-si, Hosi-si, and each side of the patrineal ties, and that the Defendant determined that the Plaintiff’s “contribute and patrine-do infection” constituted the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State, and that the Plaintiff’s “Mamo-patrine patrine” does not meet the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State.

(A) The Plaintiff, who was recognized as the requirements for the State, was judged below the rating level in a physical examination after the Plaintiff’s injury of “fore, sporadity and sporadity.”

Accordingly, on August 22, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for the re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the basis of additional wounds in each of the following: (a) following a resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement; and (b) on November 13, 2013, the Plaintiff fell under the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State who sustained an injury in the course of military operations after the Vietnam War; (c) but (d) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s “Sechopathism, the left-hand-hand mixed hearing, and the high blood pressure” did not meet the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State on the ground that the direct causal relationship with the person of distinguished service is not recognized at the time of military service, the Plaintiff refused to apply for additional registration of distinguished

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition.” The instant disposition added to the instant disposition, where the registration of additional wounds is rejected, combined with each of the instant disposition, the right-to-hand dysia, and the left-hand dysia, hereinafter referred to as “the instant wound”). 【The ground for recognition.】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings.