손해배상(의)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall be revoked, and the revoked part shall be applicable.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the claim of this case as to the claim of this court as to the assertion that the parties emphasize or add to this court shall add the following "2. Additional determination" to the assertion that the parties emphasize or add to this court. With respect to the violation of the duty to explain, the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the violation of the duty to explain are identical to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as to the following "3. height", and therefore,
2. Additional determination
A. According to the medical record appraisal entrustment to the Korean Medical Association as to the assertion of violation of the duty to observe and observe during the process of medication of vulnerable maths, this court's appraisal of the medical record appraisal of the Korean Medical Association was conducted by the deceased, taking into account the deceased's old age, suffering from urology, high blood pressure, etc., and blood urines were received for a long time due to chronic renals, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital should have discovered more active causes when the second oxygen was deteriorated, and should have been treated accordingly. In response to the medical personnel's response that should have been taken, the medical personnel should have taken measures to continuously observe and measure the active signs such as oxygen, blood pressure and beer, and dynadium gas analysis, and the measurement of dynath carbon pressure. Based on these results, it is examined whether it can be recognized as negligence in the course of anesthesia by the medical personnel of the defendant hospital.
According to the above evidence, at the time, the medical personnel at the defendant hospital continuously observe and measure active factors, such as oxygen stegradism, blood pressure, beer, and absorbing of the deceased, and the second stegradation rate was reduced to the third 15:28 after the second stegradation rate, and the deceased was found to have failed to detect special abnormal stegradation to the deceased before the stegradation rate was reduced to the third stegradation rate (as for evidence B-2 of this case, active stegradism, such as oxygen stegradation rate of the deceased, is stated only 10 minutes during the instant procedure, and the deceased was the third stegradation rate around 15:28.