Therefore, it was intended to find out the contact address of the party who sought his intention to do so, but the victim was unable to make a normal telephone call due to the lack of proper telephone, but there was a fact that the victim did not have a telephone call, but did not hear sufficient justifications as to who did such act.

From September 16, 2015 to September 2015

9. 12:27 around October 12: 10: 27, contact with the victim B’s Facebook messages inside the Internet Korea office, Inc., the 20th floor of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-dong Media Center, Inc., in the victim B’s facebook, and “whether such female fluent rice is fluent fluent

The death discarded, cut off, cut off,

쫄 보 새끼, 지금도 혹시 심장 떨리냐,

진짜 좇 같이 생겼다 성형 좀 해 나처럼 , 아 재미없어 붕 신 새끼 진짜, 꺼져 걍, 시발 거. ”라고 4회에 걸쳐 문자 메시지를 보내

The article that arouses fear and apprehensions through information and communication network has repeatedly arrived at the victim.

2. The instant case is an offense falling under Article 74(1)3 or 47-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested pursuant to Article 74(2) of the said Act.

According to the records, it is recognized that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint stating that he/she does not want to be punished by the defendant to this court on December 14, 2015, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.