except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 29, 2012, the Defendant, from around 19:00 on January 29, 2012 to around 06:00 on the following day, destroyed a locking device using a c.330,00 tons of the market price at which the victim E installed with a locking device on the bicycle storage unit in Yangsan-si, and then destroyed a locking device using a c.330,000 tons of a bicycle installed with a locking device in Yangsan-si.

2. On February 19, 2012, on February 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a locking device using an irregular tool in an amount equivalent to KRW 3,300,00,00 at the left side of the entrance of the entrance 1, 23:48, 201, the Defendant: (b) at the same time, at the victim E installed and installed a locking device at the bicycle storage unit; (c) destroyed the locking device at the same time as the victim E installed and installed a locking device at the bicycle storage unit; and (d) stolen bicycles.

3. On November 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 00:30, the G Singing room located in Yangsan City F; (b) the Defendant did not have the intent and ability to pay the drinking value because of the lack of money in the number even if he/she received an order of alcoholic beverage and alcoholic beverage; (c) as if he/she would immediately repay the drinking value; (d) he/she would have changed the drinking value to the victim H and made a false statement; and (e) he/she received the alcohol and alcoholic beverage amounting to KRW 75,00,000 from the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement to I and J;

1. Each statement of E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles 329 and 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It shall be decided as ordered on the grounds that the suspended execution is not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the period of detention and the amount of damage, etc.);