2. The judgment that the defendant has the same criminal history and committed the same criminal conduct during the period of repeated crime is an unfavorable condition to the defendant.

On the other hand, however, the victims' degree of damage is not significant, some of the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant's depth is against the defendant's depth.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various circumstances, such as the background, means and methods of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, and the Defendant’s age and happiness environment, as indicated in the records and pleadings, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.