2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status to the Defendant on December 6, 2012, after entering the Republic of Korea.

The defendant, on February 12, 2014, promulgated with sufficient grounds for persecution (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on May 2, 2014, but was dismissed on December 16, 2014.

[Based on the recognition, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of the instant case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings was born and cultivated in the area of Pakistan’s punja.

On April 201, the Plaintiff joined a political party under the name of "M Qami Move Management" (hereinafter referred to as "M QM"), and was subject to total attack and assault by 10 persons, who had engaged in clothes while engaging in political party publicity activities around May 2012.

The above perpetrators are presumed to be the party members belonging to “Pakistan Mus Lag price-Nwaz(hereinafter referred to as “PML-N”).

Even though the plaintiff reported the above total attack and assault to the police, the police did not take any measures on the ground that the above perpetrator belongs to the police.

After that, on June 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to the total attack from the non-stigious winners on two occasions, and all of them are considered to be by the political parties belonging to the PL-N.

The plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea from the members of the PML-N, and the defendant did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee. The disposition of this case is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Recognizing facts.