If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

A victim B, as a ship yard, has made efforts to obtain Korean nationality by having C, one of its own children with Chinese nationality, and was introduced via D during the process of appointing an attorney-at-law who was notified of the denial of naturalization by the relevant authorities around June 4, 2018 and trying to conduct an administrative appeal.

On June 2018, 2018, the Defendant called “C will be able to have the Korean nationality acquired by calling to the said D to appoint an attorney-at-law who knows five million won or more,” at a place where it is impossible to identify a place below Seoul. The Defendant called “C will be able to obtain Korean nationality” from the same date.

7. Between 22 and 32, a sum of five million won was remitted from the account in the name of the victim C used by the victim.

However, the defendant thought that he would receive money from the victim to use it for his debt repayment, and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to appoint an attorney for the administrative appeal for naturalization of the above C.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 5 million won from the victim as a lawyer fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;