2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The parties’ status network C is a person who was infected by the sluncing and farming removal in a hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and the spouse of the deceased, and the Plaintiff A is a dependent on the deceased’s spouse, the Plaintiff B is a dependent on the deceased.

B. 1) The Deceased’s operations on the Deceased are as follows: Nonparty E (hereinafter “Nonindicted E”) and Nonparty E (hereinafter “Nonindicted E”)

(2) On October 18, 2014, the written request for medical treatment prepared by a non-party council member of the Defendant hospital was written to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital on the ground of the fluor and fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, etc.

3) The Defendant hospital suffered from high blood pressure, urology, and urology by the deceased, and neglected to treat the injury on the left side at the time of the deceased’s death, and caused a recurrence of infection on the upper part of the body at the time of the deceased’s death, which led to a recurrence of infection on the upper part of the body at the time of his death, and the outbreak of mecopical typhism has occurred before 2 months before her death, and confirmed that three times of mecopical mecopical mecopium was continued, and the Defendant hospital conducted mecopical tests, blood tests, spacopic cultivation tests, radiation therapy tests, the left side scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s.