If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

피고인은 2015. 8. 6. 23:45경 서울 마포구 D에 있는 ‘E’라는 상호의 주점에서 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 서울 마포경찰서 F지구대 소속 경장 G이 피를 흘리고 있는 피고인을 위해 피고인의 부친과 통화하여 지구대에 보호조치를 하기로 하고 피고인에게 그 사실을 알리자 갑자기 G의 뒷목을 1회 때리고 발로 배를 걷어찼다.

피고인은 위와 같은 이유로 공무집행방해죄로 현행범인 체포되어 순찰차에 태워져 F지구대로 연행되던 중 갑자기 옆 좌석에 있는 G의 머리채를 잡아당기고 발로 G의 얼굴 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of Trabbox Image Data);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a fine shall be imposed by taking into account the following: (a) the circumstances of the crime of this case, such as assaulting a police officer who intends to take a hand to commit a crime with the reason for sentencing, or assaulting a police officer inside a patrol vehicle in operation, is not sufficient; (b) however, it appears that the method of obstructing the performance of official duties, the degree of obstructing the performance of official duties thereby, etc. are not much significant; (c) it is the primary offender who has no record of investigation or punishment so far; and (d) it is likely that contingently causing the crime of this case to occur; and (d) it is against the fact that his mistake is divided and reflected.

The age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the defendant.