On March 2017, the Plaintiff decided to purchase MESA TOL equipment (hereinafter “instant equipment”) from C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

C’s staff D sent a estimate of the instant equipment to the F e-mail account (G) of the Plaintiff on March 22, 2017 with his e-mail account (E).

F sent the e-mail to D on March 22, 2017, the F sent the text file that ordered the instant equipment to US$ 475,000.

At the time, the mail was sent to two (H, I) the e-mail account of the Plaintiff employees.

D On March 22, 2017, sent the F's mercence on the F, with ① the invoice number (K) designated for remittance, ② the order file signed in the meaning of confirmation attached to the invoice (INVICE) and ② the order file.

Plaintiff

L sent to the e-mail account (I) on March 29, 2017, an e-mail to the effect that “the Plaintiff is expected to send a receipt after remittance because it is expected to do so within the day.”

The above e-mail account was sent to three (H, M, and G) of the Plaintiff’s e-mail account.

L received e-mail from the e-mail account (N; hereinafter “private e-mail account”) considerably similar to D’s e-mail account on March 29, 2017, stating that “C has a problem with C’s bank account, so C has ceased to stop transfers,” and on March 29, 2017, that “C has a problem with C’s other certified accounts.”

The second e-mail was accompanied by a document stating the Bank account (P. hereinafter referred to as the “instant account”) indicating the depositor as “O company”.

3 copies of the e-mail account of the Plaintiff’s staff as described in the above 5 above were sent.

On March 30, 2017, the Plaintiff remitted USD 475,000 to the instant account.

F sent on March 31, 2017 the e-mail that confirms the deposit in the e-mail account with the misrepresentation of 08:56, and then sent it.