개인택시운송사업면허취소처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The Defendant’s act on April 19, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the revocation of the license for private taxi transport business and the revocation of the revocation of the qualification for private taxi transport business, and the first instance court rejected the claim of revocation of the license for private taxi transport business and the claim of revocation of the qualification for private taxi transport business.
Since only the defendant appealed, this Court's decision is limited to the claim for cancellation of the cancellation of the license of the private taxi transport business.
2. The background of the disposition and the grounds for the court’s explanation on this part are the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
3. The Plaintiff’s assertion was difficult to expect that the victim who met on the road might enjoy at night, the victim also want the Plaintiff’s prior wife, and at least five years’s exemplary driving, etc., the Plaintiff’s revocation disposition of the Plaintiff’s license for private taxi transport business under Article 43 of the Enforcement Decree of the Passenger Transport Service Act was abused and abused discretion.
4. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is the same as the part of the 6th judgment of the court of first instance from 9 to 18th judgment, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
5. According to the records of this case, the suspension of execution of the disposition of cancellation of the license for private taxi transport business is recognized as an urgent need to prevent damage that can be caused to the plaintiff, and there is no evidence to prove that the execution of the above disposition is likely to seriously affect public welfare, and the cancellation of the license for private taxi transport business is suspended ex officio until the judgment of this case becomes final
6. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s revocation disposition of the taxi transport business license.