2. The Defendant, for about 10 months, took the name of a credit card merchant on behalf of others, and during the said period, a total of KRW 99.4 million was made over 329 times during the said period, and it is reasonable to have a total of KRW 9.4 million, and the Defendant was punished for the same crime even in 2009.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and means of crime, and consequences as shown in the records and pleadings, all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is only within the reasonable scope of discretion and cannot be deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is difficult to accept.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.