사기
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Punishment of the crime
On February 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months at the Jeonju District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 16, 2012.
On August 201, the Defendant, at the (oil) EE office operated by the Defendant in Yong-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si, had a bad personal credit around that time, and had no intent or ability to pay the construction cost from time to time due to a lack of financial standing of the said company, but had the victim F, who was an indoor tegrative business operator, told the said company, as if the said company ordered the artificial tegrative construction work of a considerable quantity in the future, and had the said company executed the artificial tegrative construction of the “G store,” which was in preparation for the opening of the business.
At the end of August 2011, the Defendant, introduced the victim from H, “I would like to be equipped with a nationwide chain with a company that is engaged in sports consulting, manufacturing and selling health equipment, etc.” The Defendant would be able to have a considerable quantity of interior works in the future. However, there are only one BAR operated by H, which is currently in the state of suspending operations and is currently preparing for artificial construction. (I would like to first dump when I would have dump dume construction first dump).”
The Defendant, at around September 20, 201, concluded a construction contract with the victim’s commencement of the said construction work, and around September 20, 201, the Defendant acquired property profits equivalent to the said amount by failing to pay at all KRW 60 million for the completion of the said construction work even after completion of the said work on October 6, 201, with the payment of KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000 for contract deposit around September 28, 201, and the remainder payment of KRW 20,000,000,000 until November 15, 201.
In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. The fifth statement of the defendant in part; and