2. In light of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant; and (b) most damaged items were returned, the Defendant committed each of the instant offenses without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times during the period of repeated crime due to such previous crimes; (c) the number of each of the instant offenses is large; (d) the victims did not agree with the majority or most victims; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, motive, means, and consequence; and (e) other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances before and after the commission of the offense, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.