1. Interference with business;

A. At around 20:30 on October 8, 2012, the Defendant entered the E convenience store operated by the victim D in Gumi-si, Simi-si, and purchased 1 disease from the victim, and without any reason, took a bath to the victim, and without any reason, she saw the victim into the knitter, and she lick the knitter in his hand, and opened the knitter display stand and the door display stand beyond the knit, thereby preventing customers from entering the above convenience store by avoiding a disturbance for about 20 minutes, and thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store operation by force.

B. At around 21:30 on October 8, 2012, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim G in the Gumi Sinsi F applied for alcohol by entering the H restaurant operated by the victim G, but the Defendant’s ordinary drinking room was not good, the Defendant: (a) provided the victim who did not drink the alcohol “the hinging year and the same opening year”; and (b) 15 minutes of the disturbance, i.e., e., being pushed away out of the restaurant, thereby obstructing the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force.

2. On October 8, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed an obstruction of the performance of official duties with respect to the performance of official duties; (b) the Defendant, along with the slope J of the said police box, sent to the said police box after receiving a report on the disturbance as above, prevented the Defendant from punishing other civil petitioners who were going to a police box, and punishing them for trial expenses; and (c) the Defendant, upon the Defendant, transferred the J to the J.

1. The tax base return is A.

Chewingly, the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order, etc. was obstructed by assaulting the police officer's left-hand knee, kneeing the left-hand knee, kneeing the left-hand knee, walking on the right-hand knee, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement of K, J, G, and D;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. The point of interference with business under Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and imprisonment with prison labor for the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;