beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.01.14 2019고정1593

자동차관리법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one who has not been entrusted with the operation, etc. of motor vehicles from the owner of any motor vehicle violating the Motor Vehicle Management Act or from the owner of any motor vehicle;

Nevertheless, at around 11:55 on January 15, 2019, the Defendant operated the said car without being entrusted with matters concerning the operation, etc. by D (Death) or his heir, the owner of the vehicle C in front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at around 11:55 on January 15, 2019, driving a vehicle of liquid words C, leading the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government front road to the F bank from the E bank to the F bank.

In such cases, a driver has a duty of care to properly see the front door and the left door and the left door and accurately manipulate the steering direction and brake system, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, caused the part of the victim G G, which was parked in the safety zone of the front front of the passenger car operation zone of the Defendant, to be shocked with the front part of the passenger car operation zone of the Defendant, and damaged the rear door of the damaged vehicle and the front door of the steering zone to be 870,000 won, and did not provide the victim with the personal information (name, telephone number, address) of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of G traffic accidents;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses (D) of motor vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance statement;

1. Article 81-7-2 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 24-2 (1) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines for negligence, Article 156 subparagraph 10 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the amounts);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to provisional payment order are as follows.