beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.03.23 2015구합77066

토지수용보상금증액 등

Text

1. The defendant,

A. As to KRW 10,00,000 among each of the above 368,775,60 won and the above 10,000 won to Plaintiff A and D, respectively, < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26500, Oct. 14, 2015>

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice 1): Private investment project (water sources-six (six (6) vehicles) in the name of the highway E-U.S., and hereinafter “instant project”);

2) Project implementer: Seoul Regional Land Management Office (Land Compensation) and 3 Notice: F publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 21, 201; G public notification by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on April 30, 201; H public notification by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on September 3, 2014; and I public notification by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on June 9, 2015.

B. On June 15, 201, the land before dividing the land owned by the Plaintiffs, etc. on June 1, 201, the land category of which was changed on June 1, 201, and on November 7, 2012, K 239 square meters, K 222 square meters in light-si, K 222 square meters (attached Table 1’s land indicated in paragraph (2)), 9 square meters in light-si, L 417 square meters in light-si, 318 square meters in light-si (attached Table 1’s land indicated in paragraph (3)), Plaintiff 5,000 (attached Table 1’s land indicated in attached Table 5,049 square meters), and Plaintiff 2,65,000 square meters in light-si, 5,000 square meters in 20,000,0000 (attached Table 1’s land), each of which was changed to 45,000 square meters in 25,0025,00 square meters prior to 24,25.

[Attachment 1] Each land (e.g., sound part) after the subdivision, including each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case,” and “JJ” is referred to as “J”).

The Defendant’s acquisition of land by consultation with the Plaintiffs was conducted to acquire the land owned by the Plaintiffs necessary for the instant project, and as a result, on April 9, 2013, the Defendant’s name was based on an agreement on the acquisition of land owned by the Plaintiffs for public use on April 3, 2013 with respect to 2,421 square meters prior to theO owned by the Plaintiffs, Q2,405 square meters prior to Q, and 5,242 square meters prior to Q.