When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person operating Internet NAB “D” (D), a meeting for eradicating C, and the victim E is the mother of the so-called “F,” and the Defendant and the victim are in conflict with each other, depending on differences in opinions, while engaging in the said carpet in relation to C issues. The Defendant, the victim and the members of the carpet have posted comments on the Defendant and the victim via bulletin board or mobile phone message.

1. On March 9, 2014, at around 04:08, the Defendant: (a) connected the Internet Niber “D”, “D”, and “H”; and (b) pursuant to the conscientious member bulletin, the Defendant sought to set up money for a sincere member. However, the campaign for eradicating C would not have ever come equally because it is very rare; (c) it was difficult to build an I or L corporation with an I or L at a place in the Korean Victim Support Association (KOVA); and (d) made all of the victim’s family members to be a director, and (d) made it difficult for the Defendant to take part in the project plan to “I or KI or KI to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part in his or her ability to take part.”

As above, the Defendant destroyed the reputation of the victim by divulging public facts via an information and communications network with intent to defame the victim.

2. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant, at around 13:41 on April 25, 2014, posted a written notice of the summary judgment to the effect that “A victim E was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a prison term of six months due to a crime of adultery in the Cheongju District Court Chocheon branch on February 13, 2014,” and that “A number of the above written judgment, the victim E of the written judgment, and L’s name shall be identified as “A number of the above written judgment, the victim E of the written judgment,” and the case search by the Supreme Court B, which can identify L.