beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.02.07 2013노937

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In light of the overall circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is a favorable condition that the Defendant, under the agreement with the victim of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) committed the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and provided information to the investigation agency to the Defendant, and provided cooperation in investigation. However, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months on September 30, 201 as a crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) and committed the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) during the grace period, and committed the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Violences, etc. (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) and all other sentencing conditions including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.