The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower court and the first instance court in light of the evidence duly admitted, it is justifiable to reject the Defendants’ assertion that the Defendants’ act constitutes a self-help or a legitimate act on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the act of wording

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed, and thus, in this case where each term fine has been imposed on the Defendants, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.