When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 10:32 on January 8, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven a 2 cargo vehicle in the vicinity of the outer circular expressway in both sides of the two weeks, and changed the vehicle; (b) caused the victim B to lick the string of the string to the Defendant; and (c) caused the victim B to feel the risk of the accident even though the sudden breakdown did not occur; and (d) continuously caused the victim to lick the vehicle before the victim driver's driving car, and (e) caused the victim to suffer the danger of the accident; and (e) the victim continued to drive the vehicle by changing the lick line to prevent the front of the victim's driver's vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a dangerous vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there was no retaliation against the victim, and there was no fact of intimidation using a dangerous object, for the purpose of threatening the victim. The Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that there was no retaliation against the victim, and that there was no threat against the victim by using a dangerous object.

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거를 종합하면, 피고인이 방향지시 등을 켜지 않고 2 차로에서 3 차로로 끼어들었고 이에 피해자가 놀라 경적을 울리자 피고인이 급제동하였으며, 피해자가 상향 등을 켠 사실, 이후 피해 자가 피고인차량을 피하고자 2 차로로 진로변경을 하자 피고인이 피해자를 따라 밀어붙이듯이 2 차로로 진로변경한 사실, 당시 피고인이 주행하던 3 차로는 전방이 뻥 뚫려 있었으나 2 차로에는 피해자 차량 전방에 다른 승합차량이 진행하고 있어 공간이 좁았음에도 무리하게 들어온 사실, 이에 피해자가 다시 3 차로로 진로변경하자 피고인 또한 재차 밀어붙이며 차선을 변경하려고 시도한 사실 등이...