beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.13 2016가단5065745

임대차보증금

Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 7,917,300 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and KRW 1,566,00 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that was established on March 26, 2010 for the purpose of the development and service business of educational content and is operating various private teaching institutes, such as “L language institute.”

The Defendants are the following among the buildings on the ground N in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government non-M. 4 lots.

The "house room" as stated in the paragraph shall be the owners of each relevant store (hereinafter referred to as the "building of this case").

B. On September 23, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter referred to as the instant lease agreement) between the Defendants and a security deposit, down payment, and monthly rent for the instant building as indicated in each of the following columns; and the lease agreement period from October 20, 2015 to October 19, 2020 (5) (hereinafter referred to as “the instant lease agreement”).

(Unit) Serial Nos. 1601, 601, B79, 700, 700, 7007, 700, 7007, 7007, 7007, 570 2602, C 15,660, 566,0001, 400 1,409, 3603, 6333, 6333, 3005, 6068, 60468, 6068, 607, 608, 60468, 605, 6068, 605, 607, 605, 608, 605, 607, 605, 607, 605, 607, 605, 607, 6086, 6086, 637

C. At the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff and the Defendants leased the instant building for the purpose of using it as educational research facilities or business facilities, and they cannot use the leased object for any other purpose without the Defendants’ consent, and the contract deposit was concluded on the date of conclusion of the contract and the remainder (the amount after deducting the down payment from the security deposit) on October 19, 2015.

In accordance with the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid the said down payment to the Defendants on September 23, 2015.

E. On December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff set the date of opening the private teaching institute in the instant building.

At the time of conclusion of the instant lease agreement, the instant building is Class 2.