On August 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seoul Central District Court, and the execution of the sentence was completed on January 20, 2016 at the Daejeon Prison.

around 09:30 on October 201, 201, the Defendant heard the horses “I am to the house with alcohol,” from the victim H ( South, 48 years old) who was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol in the 6 line of Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office 260 Dasan-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant sent back the victim's right side side of the victim's right side of the victim's side of the pentle (14 cm in length) that he had been in the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor.

around 23:09 on September 13, 2016, the Defendant expressed the victim I (son, 31 years old) who took part in the Defendant’s outbreak on around the 7-2 platform of the Kasan-ro subway No. 2 in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for the reason that he was taking part in the Defendant’s outbreak, and expressed the victim’s desire that “I would dwarf,” and that the victim “I would like to take part in the outbreak of this weather. I would like to see the victim’s epich,” and in drinking twice, I would like to see the victim’s spath, and then, I would like to have the victim’s spathic damage and spathic, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 975"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Criminal tools, photographs, and photographs of damage;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in the judgment: References about criminal history and investigation reports (the report of confirmation of completion of the execution of punishment);

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of investigation reports (case of confirmation of CCTV images in a dry-scale area)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Although the defendant had been punished several times as a violent crime, he again committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, even though the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act was the same.

However, it seems that victims' damage is not significant.

The crime under paragraph (2) is committed.