However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On August 12, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.133% among blood transfusion around 04:00, the Defendant driven B-learning cars at approximately 100 meters from the roads near the school history of the elementary school located in the room located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the roads front of the Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Non-Indicteding Sea Force.

2. On August 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 04:23, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of drinking on the roads of the Seocho-gu Seocho-gu 866-20 Air Forcedung-dong, Seocho-gu 866-20, which was the slopeD and E belonging to the Seoul District Court C, which was under the influence of drinking; (c) but (d) failed to recognize the measure of drinking; and (d) attempted to board the said vehicle, and (e) failed to comply with the foregoing D, the Defendant “I will am off, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.”

“Ching the bath,” and assaulted the upper part of the D as a hingsaw, the left part of the E as soon as possible, and the buckbucks, such as the hinging to the bucks.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on drinking control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A paper of measurement of drinking alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime; Article 148-2(2)2 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act; the choice of imprisonment with prison labor as to the facts constituting the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following various factors: (a) the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (no person in charge of special sentencing) (a person in charge of sentencing] is contrary to the decision of sentencing; (b) there is no criminal record exceeding the fine; and (c) the defendant's age, sexual behavior, power, drinking volume, degree of assault, etc.; and (d) the punishment shall be determined as per the order.