When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50 days shall apply.

1. On July 9, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, after receiving a report from 112 to the C church in front of, and in front of, the C church located in, Gosong-gun B on July 23:48, 2020, to the effect that “the principal offender scam the scambling of the church while scaming the church,” and that the Defendant scamed to the reporter D, and confirmed that the Defendant scam for the reason that he was able to do so.

“Along with the questions asked to the purport, each of the above circumstances F and the border G was assaulted by each of the following: (a) the chest part of the horse G was pushed in both hands, was sealed at one time on the right part of the f in drinking; (b) the f’s hand while putting the f’s hand in drinking during the process of being proved by using the cellular phone; and (c) the cell phone f’s hand, which was driven by the f’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant has prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties in relation to the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. While the Defendant’s insultd two persons, such as the said reporter D and Ha, at the same time, at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph (1) above, the Defendant abused the victims publicly by publicly alleging them to the victim F, the police officer called the victim F, and the victim G, “I have to do not wrap, the police gushes, and she have to do so, us must the police, and she have to do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Defendant’s respective police statements made to F, G, and D statute on video CDs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Selection of each fine for negligence provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (amount of money to be converted to a workhouse: 100,000 won per day);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the instant crime was committed against a uniform police official who performs his duties, and thus, the nature of such crime is not good.