2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

A. The court shall recognize the existence and content of a declaration of intent in accordance with the content of the document, unless it is acknowledged that there was an express or implied agreement different from the content of the document, if the authenticity of the judgment on the cause of the claim is recognized by a reflective document (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 97Da1013, Jan. 21, 200). According to the evidence No. 1, the plaintiff can be recognized as having lent KRW 32 million as of May 30, 2009 by setting the due date for repayment as of May 30, 2009. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff KRW 32 million.

B. On the part of the defendant's assertion, the defendant argued that the defendant prepared a loan certificate to the plaintiff, but the defendant paid monthly the amount stated therein. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's above assertion, and the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.